Three Evangelical Perspectives on Witnessing to Mormon Missionaries

This article was originally posted at Dan Phillips’ blog, Biblical Christianity. I am re-posting here as a part of a three-article simultaneous posting between Tim and Bridget, two other evangelical bloggers. Please see their articles as well.

Getting turned down and even having doors slammed in your face isn’t fun. It’s emotionally and physically draining. I know because many Mormons are rude to me on a weekly basis here in Utah on evangelistic outings. No matter how positive and polite I try to be, that I am trying to convert them from their Restoration to our Great Apostasy doesn’t go over well. “Get a job.” “What are you, an anti-Mormon?” “You should be ashamed of yourself.” “What did the Mormons ever do to you?” “How much money do you get paid to do this?” “Don’t you have anything better to do?”

All that, but at least I still get to pick up the phone and talk to my mom whenever I want. Mormon missionaries are typically only allowed to send letters/email once a week, and make a phone call twice a year to their family. Once on Christmas, and once on Mother’s Day. They eat lots of Ramen noodles, Mac and Cheese, and anything else cheap that a budget-conscious bachelor pad might serve.

Mormons tell us all the time to take our tough and deep questions to the young missionaries, because surely these guys know the answers. But that is hardly the case. These are a bunch of young 19 and 20-year-olds who are playing the part of a Mormon tradition that is designed to help them plant deep roots of Mormon commitment and belief. Many of them are on their mission to participate in an adventure and figure things out for themselves, not yet having the deep belief in Mormonism that they wish they had. The two-year-mission largely functions in Mormonism to solidify that belief. It’s a spiritually formative time in their life, and it’s our duty to plant seeds of truth in love.

When a new set of missionaries (they usually cycle out to different proximate areas every three months or so) knocks on my door, it’s usually because I have requested a new video resource they have advertised (do this!), because I have filled out a card in one of their Visitor’s Centers or public events (never pass that up!), or because a neighbor feels like I really need to be converted (hey, they care!). I’m more than delighted to have them over. Know that you can practice warm hospitality without welcoming them as fellow believers. Welcome them in, have them sit down, and bring them somethings to drink (save snacks for a bit later to keep them a bit longer).

Ask them where they are from, about their families, and what their post-mission plans are. They will want to quickly segue to their religious message. They usually ask me, “So how much do you know about the Church?” I am forthright about my knowledge of the Mormon faith. “I have studied it for years, I find it fascinating, but I have some grave concerns.” But what I know about the history and larger movement of Mormonism is inconsequential for the moment, because “I would love to hear what you two individually believe.”

Allow the missionaries to spend some time delivering their message, but look for points at which you can ask questions about the fundamental nature of God. Because I never know how short or long their visit will be, or if they will ever return, I make it a point to quickly get to the heart of the matter. For me that usually entails asking if they believe God once was a mere man who had to progress unto godhood, and whether they believe this mere man was once perhaps a sinner. The responses are varied, but usually heartbreaking and shocking. (See God Never Sinned)

The most important passage that I know to share with a Mormon is Isaiah 43:10:

“Before me no god was formed,
nor shall there be any after me.”

I recommend using this passage even if you only have a few minutes. Ask the missionaries to “share their testimonies”, and patiently listen. They have a series of affirmations they will articulate here, usually something like, “I know the Church is true and has the restored priesthood, I know that Jesus is the Messiah, I know that the Book of Mormon is true, and I know the Thomas S. Monson is a modern-day prophet of God.”

“Thank you for sharing your testimony. Would you mind if I shared a testimony as well?”

“Sure.”

“The testimony I have to share right now isn’t my testimony, it is God’s testimony.” At this point I try to avoid using terms like “Bible” and “scripture” and “word of God”, and instead use the term “testimony of God.” Referring to God’s written revelations as the testimonies of God is perhaps the clearest and strongest way we evangelicals can communicate the nature of scripture to Mormons.

I open up the testimonies of God and put my finger under the passage to help them simultaneously read with their eyes as they listen with their ears: “God bears witness of himself in Isaiah 43:10, testifying, ‘Before me no god was formed [PAUSE], nor shall there be any after me.’ If we trust the testimony of man, how much more should we trust the testimony of God himself.”

This also works great in the beginning of a longer conversation, as it preempts the feelings-oriented Mormon epistemology that they want to promote. Mormon missionaries are taught to foster a kind of atmosphere and attitude among listeners. The next step for them is to help you identify a set of positive emotions with the Holy Spirit. By preemptively referring to scripture as the “testimony of God”, I have made it more difficult for them to appeal to human feelings as the chief, decisive vehicle of God’s authoritative revelation.

Other topics that are great to cover are the unique priesthood of Jesus Christ (Hebrews 7), the explosively good news of the justification of the ungodly (Romans 4:4-8), and the importance of putting our feelings and thoughts in a system of checks and balances that realistically takes into account our finiteness and depravity and God’s authority and omnipotence (Isaiah 40:8; Acts 17:11; 1 Thessalonians 5:21). A wonderful list of passages put together by James White for witnessing to Mormons is available here.

You will inevitably be asked to read a section of the Book of Mormon and pray about that. On that issue please see an article by Bill McKeever.

A great way to get them to come back is not to hog the conversation, but to let them have their say. Practice using questions as a way of drawing out the topics you would like to address. Our interactions are not an endless emergent “conversation”, but neither are they an overwhelmingly aggressive monologue (I have learned this the hard way). Keep a mental note of three or so tough questions that went unanswered, and write them down for them.

“Would you guys please research the answers to these questions, and come back another time to share what you found?” Insist on it with a free dinner. In some areas, Mormon missionaries are not allowed to eat meals at the houses of other Mormons. This is designed to encourage them to eat with non-Mormon households or at a Mormon house with non-Mormon guests. The problem is that many missionaries end up eating a lot of those Ramen noodles. Your kitchens are the solution to this wonderful problem.

At the end, they will ask for someone to close in prayer, usually the head of the household. Use the opportunity to pray to our awesome and eternal God. Thank God before everyone in the living room for the free and immediate gift of justification, forgiveness, and eternal life. Thank him for transforming your heart to love and follow Jesus. Thank Jesus that in him we have all the riches of knowledge and wisdom and understanding, and that without him, we have nothing, and that with him we have everything. And beseech the Spirit to help everyone in the room to pursue the truth of the gospel, lest we suffer that awful punishment that the Bible describes as never-ending.

Get their phone number in case you have to reschedule, and use that number to remind them of the dinner appointment that you’re looking forward to. Trust me, this is important. They forget (either literally or sometimes intentionally) to show up and either never come back, or call to apologize, since something came up. Sometimes they are lazy, sometimes they are just busy. Give them the benefit of doubt and stuff them full of more dinner. Serve a dessert twenty minutes after dinner is over so that they feel obliged to stay longer than they would have. Keep inviting them over and over to eat more dinner, discuss more issues, and address more of the outstanding questions. It won’t last forever, so make the best use of your time. Ron Rhodes writes,

“Don’t move forward in a mad rush to discuss spiritual things, especially if you have the opportunity to work toward developing a personal relationship. When the Lord opens the door for witnessing, however, be ready to walk through it.

“The exception to this rule, of course, is if you know for certain that you will never see that particular Mormon again. Then you will want to cover as much doctrinal ground as possible, biblically refuting the most blatant heresies in Mormon theology and giving a strong personal testimony of what Jesus has done in your life.” (Ron Rhodes, Reasoning from the Scriptures with the Mormons [1995], p. 29)

This entry was posted in Friendship, Interaction, and Evangelism. Bookmark the permalink.

107 Responses to Three Evangelical Perspectives on Witnessing to Mormon Missionaries

  1. Olsen Jim says:

    Mike R,

    You said “I personally believe I’m on safe ground,as a Christian,to base my beliefs on God’s Word.”

    How do you know what God’s word is?

    Also, what proportion of the worlds population base their religion on some portion of the Bible, or “God’s word?” How do you know your interpretation is “the correct” one?

  2. Enki says:

    Martin,
    “The Book of the Dead” or “the spell for coming forth by day”. is where the “I am” quotes come from.

    The original link states, “The Egyptian Book of the Coming Forth by Light (wrongly and commonly translated as the Book of the Dead), the oldest written text in the world,….” Which doesn’t sound correct, I thought hindu texts were older.

    Another source says:

    “The earliest texts of the Book of the Dead appear on mummy shrouds of members of the 17th Dynasty royal family (c.1650-1550 BC);”

    http://www.egyptologyonline.com/book_of_the_dead.htm
    This doesn’t sound like the book of breathings.

  3. Enki says:

    Here is the opinion of one person reguarding age of texts. What is written on the wall may be something completely different from ‘the book of the dead'(book of coming forth by light).
    http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview/id/542691.html

  4. Mike R says:

    Olson Jim,

    I believe the Bible is God’s Word.( that was
    the context of the post where you got my
    statement from). Your Church also believes in
    the Bible, and I’m sure it was referenced
    many times in Gen.Conference the last few days.
    We’re on common ground it seems.

    I have this feeling though that you’re driving
    at something, since your presence here has
    been to defend your Church’s interpretation
    of the Bible. Am I wrong?
    Are you hinting at that since you follow the
    prophet of the latter-days that therefore you
    have the correct interpretation of the Bible?
    More importantly,have your Prophet and Apostles
    proven reliable to interpret the Bible for LDS ?

  5. HankSaint says:

    I’m quiet sure grindael appreciates your coming to his defense, if that is what one calls a defense. What per say did any of what you spewed out have to do with his poor research and lack of accuracy. Warranted or not, I give credit not to my self but what the facts and evidence truly warrants in revealed historical accuracy. To use a straw-man tactic was unwise and his use of it was obviously overlooked by you since you failed to correct anything I stated.

    Why would you claim anything about a lack of testimony, of course he has one and I admire all those that do, knowing that Jesus is the Christ is powerful. But if he claims to have a testimony that Mormonism is false, then I would readily disagree he has anything other then a opinion, not backed up with hard evidence or a witness from the Holy Ghost.

    I did not dismiss poor grindael, but called it as I saw it. He would not stay on topic and let go with a barrage of other issues which puts him in a bad light with those who would want to see him tackle what he first pointed out and that is when he went South in what I call the loose cannon affect that usually misses the mark. Poor criticism does not make for good proselytizing.

    When I see false accusation and phony straw-men, why would I be concerned about someone else’s personal opinion of thinking I’m just putting someone down. Please be real, bad tabloid sensationalism does not deserve anything other then my personal disgust for falsifying true history and historical accuracy.

    Regards, Richard.

  6. Enki,

    Thanks for your posts regarding ancient Egyptian religion.

    Perhaps the “I am” did arise in some very early texts, as your sources suggest (and I haven’t had time or energy to look into them, unfortunately).

    If it did, I wonder what path the idea took between the apparently diverging views of the monotheistic Hebrews and the pantheistic Egyptians.

    PS It might be controversial to say so here, but I don’t have a big problem with the Hebrew scriptures borrowing stories from surrounding cultures (though its rather speculative to assert they did so all the time). If they did, then the real question concerns how they used them.

  7. Enki says:

    Martin,
    I appreciate your honesty and openness. I don’t know if the egyptians were pantheistic, they were polytheists or perhaps henotheist for sure.

Leave a Reply