Messing with the Gospel doesn’t make you wrong…

…it makes you an evildoer.

In this sermon on Philippians 3:1-3, Christian Pastor Troy Dobbs examines the Apostles Paul’s warning to watch out for “the dogs” –religious people who “mess around with the Gospel.”

“Finally, my brothers, rejoice in the Lord. To write the same things to you is no trouble to me and is safe for you. Look out for the dogs, look out for the evildoers, look out for those who mutilate the flesh. For we are the circumcision, who worship by the Spirit of God and glory in Christ Jesus and put no confidence in the flesh—” (Philippians 3:1-3 ESV)

"Run For Your Life: Starting Block" from Grace Church on Vimeo.

Bottom line: Look out for counterfeit Christianity. Stop trusting in religion. “Run to Jesus. Run to Jesus Christ.”

Posted in Christianity, Jesus Christ, Salvation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 12 Comments

The Holy Ghost, Scriptures…and LDS Church handbooks

Some Christians have a difficult time understanding just what is authentic (read: “official”) LDS doctrine. For instance, former Fuller Theological Seminary president Richard Mouw and others like him want to believe that Mormonism can be comprehended by talking to scholars at BYU. This way of thinking completely ignores what has been taught over and over by the LDS general authorities.

look_it_up_TAs thirteenth President Ezra Taft Benson is reported to have said in a church manual that is being used twice a month throughout 2015 in adult Sunday classes, “The most important prophet, so far as we are concerned, is the one who is living in our day and age. This is the prophet who has today’s instructions from God to us.” (Teachings of Presidents of the Church: Ezra Taft Benson, 149). Criticizing those who disagree with the prophet, Benson also wrote, “The two groups who have the greatest difficulty in following the prophet are the proud who are learned and the proud who are rich. The learned may feel the prophet is only inspired when he agrees with them; otherwise, the prophet is just giving his opin­ion-speaking as a man. The rich may feel they have no need to take counsel of a lowly prophet” (Ibid., 138).

In addition, page 48 of the 2009 church manual Gospel Principles plainly states, “In addition to these four books of scripture [Bible, Book of Mormon, Doctrine and Covenants, Pearl of Great Price], the inspired words of our living prophets become scripture to us. Their words come to us through conferences, the Liahona or Ensign magazine, and instructions to local priesthood leaders.”

In an article titled “Church Handbooks: The Written Order of Things” by Seventy Per G. Malm published in the September 2015 Ensign magazine, church handbooks can be used to understand Mormonism. Known as Handbook 1 and Handbook 2, these manuals are supposed to be used by local church leaders to determine procedures and beliefs. As Malm explains, “I realize that in addition to the Holy Ghost and the scripture, what really helped me were the Church handbooks.”

The article cites Apostle Dallin H. Oaks who said, “While [the] handbooks do not have the same standing as the scriptures, they do represent the most current interpretations and procedural directions of the Church’s highest authorities” (61).

The First Presidency and the apostles “are men of ‘seasoned maturity, experience, and extensive preparation,’” Apostle Russell M. Nelson adds in the next quote. Malm then writes on page 62, “Thus, the Church handbooks reflect the collective wisdom—derived from tested, proven experiences—of prophets and apostles. That wisdom results in carrying out the mission over time.”

Malm concludes his article on page 65 with a quote from Henry B. Eyring, First Counselor in the First Presidency, who stated that “the handbooks ‘will become a treasure to you as you use [them] to help you lead others to choose the way of eternal life. That is [their] purpose.’”

For once and for all, let’s get rid of the concept that Mormon doctrine can be garnered by talking to our neighbors, co-workers, and yes, even the scholars. Anything that is said by anyone other than the LDS general authorities is relegated to mere opinion unless it can be supported by official teaching. So, the next time a Mormon tells you “the way of eternal life” and you’re not sure if what is being said is official Mormon doctrine, simply ask, “Now where is that found in the church handbook?”

Posted in Authority and Doctrine, LDS Church | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 9 Comments

Praise to the Man: Joseph Smith

LDS-hymnbooksThe September issue of the Ensign magazine includes an article celebrating the 30th “birthday” of the LDS hymnbook, Hymns (74-75). Even though the Ensign clearly states “there are no plans at this time for a new edition,” rumors are circulating to the contrary. Why the Mormon community would think a new edition is in the works despite such a clear “official” statement is interesting food for thought, but that’s not the topic of this blog post.

This rumor suggesting a new LDS hymnbook prompted Mormon blogger Jana Riess to think about what she would like to see changed in the current hymnal. Topping her list of hopeful changes is getting rid of the beloved Mormon hymn dedicated to Joseph Smith, “Praise to the Man.” Dr. Riess wrote,

“If I could jettison just one song from our repertoire, by God it would be this one—and it’s a shame, because the tune is fabulous and the tempo brisk, unlike the more snail-like LDS hymns. But this theology is simply awful. How is it that Mormons can insist up and down and until Tuesday that we don’t worship the prophet and yet continue to sing this hymn? Here the recently deceased Joseph Smith is communing with Jehovah, mingling with gods, and making plans on our behalf from heaven . . . kind of like God makes plans for us from heaven. Even worse, the song is all about how we need to glorify Joseph Smith, not God: ‘Kings shall extol him, and nations revere.’ I realize this hymn has already been made slightly less vengeful and bloody from a 1927 revision, but that’s not enough: the whole concept of this song is about worshiping a human being. Only God deserves our worship. End of story.”

I remember the first time I saw “Praise to the Man.” I was flipping through a Mormon hymnal while visiting the home of a friend who had recently joined the LDS Church. The lyrics stopped me cold. “Long shall his blood…plead unto heaven…, Great is his glory…, Earth must atone for the blood of that man…, Mingling with Gods he can plan for his brethren,… Millions shall know ‘Brother Joseph’ again.” I was…shocked. I knew a fair bit about Mormonism at this point, but this. This struck me as unabashed blasphemy, and it shook me deeply.

Perhaps it is Dr. Riess’ protestant background that helps her recognize worship of Joseph Smith inherent in “Praise to the Man.” Many Mormons don’t seem to get that. They seem entirely comfortable with the hymnal including “Praise to the Man” just two pages ahead of the hymn, “Praise to the Lord” (as published in my 1948 edition, hymn numbers 147 and 150 respectively).

keyboardI wonder if Dr. Riess is familiar with some of the other LDS hymns written to honor Joseph Smith. In 1909 the Deseret Sunday School Union published a book of songs “suitable for Primary associations, religion classes, quorum meetings, social gatherings and the home.” Hymn number 260 in this collection is “Joseph the Blest.” Winner of a contest held in 1905 commemorating the 100th anniversary of the Prophet Joseph Smith’s birth, this song is to be sung “majestically and with fervor.” It begins by praising God “Who didst on earth bestow, One hundred years ago, Joseph, the Prophet, Joseph, the mighty seer.” The second verse recounts Joseph’s First Vision, his receipt of many revelations, and his death: “Whose blood for truth was shed.” The final verse calls for the Mormon restored gospel to spread, and looks ahead to what Joseph Smith once called the “great winding up scene”:

Bid doubt and error cease,
Bring in Thy reign of peace;
Let the pure, as reward,
Meet with their Savior Lord,
Meet with their Savior Lord—Joseph, the blest!

This hymn is not in my 1948 hymnal; I’m guessing it’s not in the current LDS hymnbook either.

Another hymn praising Joseph Smith is included in my 1948 edition of Hymns, but I don’t know if it is in the current edition. This one, hymn number 296, is titled “The Seer, Joseph, The Seer.” Third Mormon President John Taylor wrote the lyrics. Leaving out some repeated lines, the song goes like this:

The Seer, the Seer, Joseph, the Seer!
I’ll sing of the Prophet ever dear;
His equal cannot be found
By searching the wide world around.
With Gods he soared in the realms of day,
And men he taught the heavenly way.
The earthly Seer! the heavenly Seer!
I love to dwell on his memory dear;
The chosen of God and the friend of man,
He brought the priesthood back again;
He gazed on the past and the future, too,
And opened The heavenly world to view.

Of noble seed, of heavenly birth,
He came to bless the sons of earth;
With keys by the Almighty given,
He opened the full rich stores of heaven;
O’er the world that was wrapped in sable night,
Like the sun he spread his golden light.
He strove, O how he strove to stay
The stream of crime in its reckless way!
With a mighty hand and a noble aim,
He urged the wayward to reclaim:
‘Mid foaming billows of angry strife,
He stood at The helm of the ship of life.

The Saints, the Saints, his only pride!
For them he lived, for them he died;
Their joys were his, their sorrows too.
He loved the Saints; he loved Nauvoo.
Unchanged in death with a Savior’s love,
He pleads their cause in the courts above.
The Seer, the Seer! Joseph, the Seer!
O how I love his memory dear!
The just and wise, the pure and free,
A father he was and is to me.
Let fiends now rage, in their dark hour–
No matter, He is beyond their power.

He’s free! he’s free! The Prophet’s free!
He is where he will ever be,
Beyond the reach of mobs and strife,
He rests unharmed in endless life.

His home’s in the sky; he dwells with the Gods
Far from the furious rage of mobs.
He died, he died for those he loved.
He reigns; he reigns in the realms above.
He waits with the just who have gone before
To welcome the Saints to Zion’s shore.
Shout, shout, ye Saints! This boon is given;
We’ll meet him, Our martyred Seer, in heaven.

Dr. Riess has reason to hope that when the LDS Church does put out a new edition of Hymns, the offensive “Praise to the Man” could very well be left out of the repertoire – just as some past, similar Mormon hymns have been excluded from newer editions of the hymnbook. She should not make the mistake in thinking, however, that such an omission would signal a new attitude within the Church toward Joseph Smith. Even though some songs praising the Prophet may not be in the current hymnal, note, for example, that the Mormon Tabernacle Choir sang “The Seer, Joseph, The Seer” at an event not too long ago (though the choir did not sing all the verses). And a recent Mormon Church manual (used for study in 2012) includes George Albert Smith’s praise of that man:

“Many of the benefits and blessings that have come to me have come through that man who gave his life for the gospel of Jesus Christ. There have been some who have belittled him, but I would like to say that those who have done so will be forgotten and their remains will go back to mother earth, if they have not already gone, and the odor of their infamy will never die, while the glory and honor and majesty and courage and fidelity manifested by the Prophet Joseph Smith will attach to his name forever.”

Joseph Smith’s glory, honor and majesty…forever? No. That is over-the-top praise (worship?) of a man.

Here is where such praise should be directed:

“Now to him who is able to keep you from stumbling and to present you blameless before the presence of his glory with great joy, to the only God, our Savior, through Jesus Christ our Lord, be glory, majesty, dominion, and authority, before all time and now and forever. Amen.” (Jude 1:24-25)

And amen.

Posted in Joseph Smith, LDS Church | Tagged , , , , , , | 13 Comments

When Moroni’s Promise is Broken

jm_300_BOM2.p-P11.tiffMost people who have experienced Mormon proselytizing are familiar with “Moroni’s Promise” found in the Book of Mormon:

“And when ye shall receive these things, I would exhort you that ye would ask God, the Eternal Father, in the name of Christ, if these things are not true; and if ye shall ask with a sincere heart, with real intent, having faith in Christ, he will manifest the truth of it unto you, by the power of the Holy Ghost.” (Moroni 10:4)

The idea here is that if someone wants to know if the Book of Mormon is true, he should apply Moroni’s promise. The result will be certain knowledge in the affirmative, imparted by the Holy Ghost. In Mormonism, this is called a “testimony.” Sounds good, but in real life it doesn’t always work out the way Moroni promises.

Years ago the LDS Ensign magazine included a regular column titled, “I Have a Question.” Mormons would submit their questions “of general gospel interest,” and would receive answers (“guidance, not as official statements of Church policy”) provided by qualified Church employees. In the March 1986 issue of Ensign, Daniel H. Ludlow, at that time the director of Church Correlation Review, provided an answer to this question:

“A friend of mine says he has prayed about the Book of Mormon but has not received a testimony of its truthfulness. Shouldn’t Moroni’s promise always work?”

Dr. Ludlow explained,

“God cannot and does not lie, and his promises made through his prophets are sure. Therefore, any person who claims to have followed the various requirements but says he has not gained a testimony should check to see which step he has not followed faithfully or completely:

“1. He should read and ponder the Book of Mormon—all of it.

“2. He should remember the methods God has used in working with the peoples of both the Book of Mormon and the Bible—and ponder these things in his heart.

“3. He should put himself in a frame of mind where he would be willing to accept (receive) all of ‘these things’—the Book of Mormon, the Bible, and the way God works with men.

“4. ‘With a sincere heart, with real intent, having faith in Christ,’ he should ask God, the Eternal Father, in the name of Jesus Christ ‘if these things are not true.’

“5. He should be able to recognize the promptings and feelings which will be evidences to him of the truth of ‘these things’ (including the Book of Mormon) as they are made manifest unto him ‘by the power of the Holy Ghost.’” (This excerpt is also found in Book of Mormon Student Manual Religion 121 and 122, 1989, pages 150-151)

Dr. Ludlow sustained the widely held Mormon belief that it is impossible to properly employ Moroni’s promise without gaining a testimony that the Book of Mormon is true. I encounter this thinking quite frequently in my conversations with Mormons. When I explain that I prayerfully read the Book of Mormon and discovered that the book is not what it claims to be, my Mormon friends’ responses are predictable. They question my sincerity, my intent, and/or my faith. Just the other day a Mormon wrote me,

“…concerning your claim on reading the Book of Mormon. I invite you to read it prayerfully again with the question: ‘God is this a [sic] thy book like the bible is thine?’ Apparently, the first time through you missed the mark…”

According to Dr. Ludlow and countless other Mormons, if someone reads the Book of Mormon and does not receive a testimony of its truthfulness, something is wrong with the person – he missed a step, he wasn’t sincere, he didn’t have enough faith, etc.

While I fully agree with Dr. Ludlow’s statement that, “God cannot and does not lie, and his promises made through his prophets are sure,” I recognize another distinct possibility in the case(s) of the failure of Moroni’s promise. Dr. Ludlow neglects to consider this option; nevertheless, if God does not lie and His promises are sure, the failure of the Book of Mormon’s promise in Moroni could very well indicate that God never made that promise in the first place. This represents a perfectly valid conclusion, but in my experience, Mormons won’t consider this alternative.

It’s easy to understand why. If God is not the author of Moroni’s Promise: the Book of Mormon is not what it claims to be; a Mormon’s “testimony” becomes untenable; Joseph Smith is revealed as a false prophet; and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints can no longer be sustained as God’s kingdom on earth.

These are hard truths. But isn’t truth what we really want? Isn’t truth what we need?

Think about it, friends. Study it out in your minds and join me in this prayer to the one true God:

“To you, O LORD, I lift up my soul. O my God, in you I trust… Lead me in your truth and teach me, for you are the God of my salvation; for you I wait all the day long.” (Psalm 25:1, 5)

Posted in Book of Mormon, Truth, Honesty, Prayer, and Inquiry | Tagged , , , , , , , | 17 Comments

Mountain Meadows Massacre Anniversary – Part 2

Posted in Viewpoint on Mormonism | Tagged | Comments Off on Mountain Meadows Massacre Anniversary – Part 2

Sufficiently humble?

In the August 2015 Ensign magazine is an anonymous article on page 10 titled “We Believe in Being Humble.” On the opposite page are artistic renderings depicting five ways a person “can show humility”: “receiving counsel and correction,” “giving selfless service,” “praying with real intent,” “serving a mission,” and “doing family history work and attending the temple more frequently.”

Joseph Smith with SwordIn Mormonism, those are all admirable goals. As President Ezra Taft Benson, who is quoted five times in this one-page article, stated, “The antidote for pride is humility—meekness, submissiveness. It is the broken heart and contrite spirit.”
Reflecting on this six-paragraph article, it made me think. First of all, it reminded me of the famous quote given by Joseph Smith toward the end of his life. On May 26, 1844—just a month before he would die at the Carthage Jail—Smith presented “his testimony against the dissenters at Nauvoo.” The talk, which can be in History of the Church 6:408-409, referenced 2 Corinthians 11:1ff and quotes Smith as saying,

“Come on! ye prosecutors! ye false swearers! All hell, boil over! Ye burning mountains, roll down your lava! for I will come out on the top at last. I have more to boast of than ever any man had. I am the only man that has ever been able to keep a whole church together since the days of Adam. A large majority of the whole have stood by me. Neither Paul, John, Peter, nor Jesus ever did it. I boast that no man ever did such a work as I. The followers of Jesus ran away from Him; but the Latter-day Saints never ran away from me yet.”

Some Latter-day Saints have argued that Smith was doing nothing more than Paul, who had “boasted” about his travails in a defense of his apostleship. Yet does Joseph Smith’s situation really compare with Paul’s? After all, Paul was innocent of the charges leveled at him. How about Joseph Smith? The Nauvoo Expositor—the one and only issue produced—explained some of the shortcomings of Joseph Smith, including his polygamous ways. (More on how Smith married about three dozen women, including teenagers and women married to living husbands, can be found at Joseph’s Wives.com) In addition to those charges, Smith was proven to be a liar (including deceiving his own wife on his other marriages) as well as a false teacher (for instance, consider the King Follett Discourse). In no way should Joseph Smith be considered in the same category as “Paul, John, Peter, (or) Jesus.”

Several passages in the Book of Mormon talk about humility, including Alma 5:27, which says,

“Have ye walked, keeping yourselves blameless before God? Could ye say, if ye were called to die at this time, within yourselves, that ye have been sufficiently humble? That your garments have been cleansed and made white through the blood of Christ, who will come to redeem his people from their sins?”

Notice how the writer explains that it is the blood of Jesus cleansing people from their sins. While Mormons like to talk about the Atonement, grace, and mercy as reasons why they have a hope at exaltation, how many of them actually think they are doing everything they’re supposed to in order to qualify for the celestial kingdom? They all “try” and “do the best” they can, but I rarely find anyone who can attest that they are doing everything the church requires.

When it comes to “doing family history work and attending the temple more frequently,” as the final illustration explains on page 11, I ask: What must a person do in order to get invited into the temple? Of course, baptism and confirmation into the LDS Church are required. In addition, the person must be a member in good standing for a year. The candidate is then interviewed by the church’s representative (the local bishop) to determine if he or she is “worthy” to receive a “temple recommend.” Among other things, this person must claim:

  • Being sexually active with nobody but a spouse
  • Imbibing no drugs, alcohol, coffee or tea
  • Faithful attendance to church functions
  • Being a full tithe payer (10%) of one’s income

The last time I checked, none of the official questions ask the candidate if he or she is “cleansed and made white through the blood of Christ.” Rather, everything asked in this interview points to one’s own works and personal actions! This scenario sure sounds different from the Harold_Copping_The_Pharisee_and_the_Publican_300parable Jesus told about the publican and the Pharisee who went to the temple to pray. Said the Pharisee:

“God, I thank thee, that I am not as other men are, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even as this publican. I fast twice in the week, I give tithes of all that I possess.” (Luke 18:11,12).

The Pharisee’s attitude is not uncommon among many sincere people who erroneously think that their “good works” impress an all-holy God. The publican’s demeanor was entirely different. Knowing that he was sinful and undeserving of God’s notice, he approached God in the temple by praying, “God be merciful to me a sinner” (Luke 18:13). His attitude, not that of the Pharisee, caused our Lord to comment, “This man went down to his house justified rather than the other” (Luke 18:14).

In the interview with the church representative, a person is required to declare his or her righteousness to be allowed to enter the temple. And if the church’s unique rules are kept, the church provides its blessing and deems the person “worthy” to receive a temple recommend card, allowing freedom to walk in the holiest places where many others members (who are, obviously, not as “worthy”) are not allowed to tread. Doesn’t this entire procedure foster a sense of pride? For someone to think they’ve earned the right to enter this unique religious building because of their personal holiness or “worthiness” is opposite from the attitude the Bible says we’re supposed to have.

All in all, when I look at what Mormonism does to people, it seems that this religious organization turns out many more Pharisees than their leaders would ever admit.

Posted in Mormon Temple, Worthiness | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 10 Comments

Mountain Meadows Massacre Anniversary -Part 1

Posted in Viewpoint on Mormonism | Tagged | Comments Off on Mountain Meadows Massacre Anniversary -Part 1

PBS Former Mormons -Part 2

Posted in Viewpoint on Mormonism | Tagged | Comments Off on PBS Former Mormons -Part 2

PBS Former Mormons – Part 1

Posted in Viewpoint on Mormonism | Tagged | Comments Off on PBS Former Mormons – Part 1

Mormonism:
Jesus is the literal “bodily offspring” of God the Father

I was just paging through an old book I found at a used bookstore. It’s titled Principles of the Gospel, published in 1961 by the Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, and contains an opening note to “Brethren” of the armed services from the First Presidency (David O. McKay, J. Reuben Clark, and Henry S. Moyle). The book contains brief explanations of various Mormon doctrines, “Based Largely Upon the Compendium (Richards-Little) With Excerpts From Other Writings.”

Under the heading “Godhead” and sub-heading “1. Father as Literal Parent,” the book states,

“Jesus Christ is the Son of Elohim both as spiritual and bodily offspring; that is to say, Elohim is literally the Father of the spirit of Jesus Christ and also of the body in which Jesus Christ performed His missions in the flesh, and which body died on the cross and was afterward taken up by the process of resurrection, and is now the immortalized tabernacle of the eternal spirit of our Lord and Savior. No extended explanation of the title ‘Son of God’ as applied to Jesus Christ appears necessary.” (196)

What do you think it means that, according to Mormonism, Jesus is the literal “bodily offspring” of God the Father?

Joseph F. SmithThis is how sixth Mormon President Joseph F. Smith would answer this question:

“You all know that your fathers are indeed your fathers and that your mothers are indeed your mothers you all know that don’t you? You cannot deny it. Now, we are told in scriptures that Jesus Christ is the only begotten Son of God in the flesh. Well, now for the benefit of the older ones, how are children begotten? I answer just as Jesus Christ was begotten of his father. The Christian denominations believe that Christ was begotten not of God but of the spirit that overshadowed his mother. This is nonsense. Why will not the world receive the truth? Why will they not believe the Father when he says that Jesus Christ is His only begotten Son? Why will they try to explain this truth away and make mystery of it?

“Now if God is a man, a glorious perfected man-that is, perfect in all his glorious attributes, and infinite in power, there never will come a time when God the Father will not have power to extend His dominion and His Glory. He is the maker of Heaven and the Earth, on which we dwell, for He made this earth by his word and by his power. How did he make it? He called the elements that are invisible to our eyes. He formed the earth on which we dwell, and has formed millions of worlds, and they are peopled with his children, for there is no end to his dominions and the worlds he has created cannot be numbered unto man.

“Now, little boys and girls, when you are confronted by infidels in the world who know nothing of how Christ was begotten, you can say he was born just as the infidel was begotten and born, so was Christ begotten by his Father, who is also our Father-the Father of our spirits-and he was born of his mother Mary.

“The difference between Jesus Christ and other men is this: Our fathers in the flesh are mortal men, who are subject unto death; but the Father of Jesus Christ in the flesh is the God of Heaven. Therefore Jesus, as he declared, received the power of life from his Father and was never subject unto death but had life in himself as his father had life in himself. Because of this power he overcame death and the grave and became master of the resurrection and the means of salvation to us all.

“Shall we as Latter-day Saints deny the truth and then claim that God made man in his likeness in the beginning? Shall we come under the impression that God possesses the power of creation, and yet did not literally create? He is not without his companion any more than I am without my companion, the mother of my children.

virgin-birth“These are truths and I wish they could be instilled into the hearts of these little children so that they will not be tossed about by every wind of doctrine and be confused by the teachers of atheism. Now, by and by you will be able to understand this far better than you can today. Some of us grandparents find it difficult to conceive the truth we want to think of something marvelous. We want to try to make it appear that God does not do things in the right way, or that he has another way of doing things than what we know, we must come down to the simple fact that God Almighty was the Father of His Son Jesus Christ. Mary, the virgin girl, who had never known mortal man, was his mother. God by her begot His son Jesus Christ, and He was born into the world with power and intelligence like that of His Father…

“Now, my little friends, I will repeat again in words as simple as I can, and you talk to your parents about it, that God, the Eternal Father is literally the father of Jesus Christ.

“Mary was married to Joseph for time. No man could take her for eternity because she belonged to the Father of her divine Son. In the revelation that has come thru Joseph Smith, we learn that it is the eternal purpose of God that man and woman should be joined together by the power of God here on earth for time and eternity.

“If a man and woman should be joined together who are incompatible to each other it would be a mercy to them to be separated that they might have a chance to find other spirits that will be congenial to them. We may bind on earth and it will be bound in Heaven, and loose on earth and it will be loosed in Heaven. I would like teachers of the Sunday school to take these simple facts and teach them to the children so that they may understand the truth, that their faith may be founded in fact and in truth; for nothing that is not built upon truth will stand. That which is false will fall. Only that which is based upon God’s truth will endure.

“Now, my brothers and sisters and the Sunday school workers, we want you to teach the children the truth and nothing but the truth.” (Messages of the First Presidency of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 4:327ff. Read the entire sermon at the MRM website.)

President Smith indicated that the LDS understanding of these things is different from “the Christian denominations” who believe “nonsense” and try to “explain the truth away.” Therefore, we must conclude that the Mormon doctrines pertaining to the “only begotten” Son are at great odds with the doctrines embraced by Christians. Though the Mormon community is divided in their individual conclusions regarding exactly how the body of Jesus was conceived, the differences between what LDS leaders have taught and what Christians believe cannot be chalked up to mere semantics, as some Mormons suggest.

Many Mormon leaders have taught ideas compatible with President Smith’s teachings regarding God being the literal father of Jesus’ body. Check them out here at mrm.org.

Posted in God the Father, Jesus Christ, Mormon Leaders, Virgin birth | Tagged , , , , , , , | 19 Comments